Paul Menage wrote: > Hi Balbir/Pavel, > > As I mentioned to you directly at the kernel summit, I think it might > be cleaner to integrate resource counters more closely with control > groups. So rather than controllers such as the memory controller > having to create their own boilerplate cf_type structures and > read/write functions, it should be possible to just call a function > something like > > control_group_add_rescounter(struct cgroup *cg, struct cgroup_subsys *ss, > struct res_counter *res, > const char *name) > > and have it handle all the userspace API. This would simplify the task > of keeping a consistent userspace API between different controllers > using the resource counter abstraction. > > Paul > Yes, I remember discussing it with you. I would expect res_counters definition to be dynamic (to be able to add the guarantee, soft limit, etc) for expansion in the future. In the future, I would also like to do hierarchical resource groups, the hierarchy would represent the current filesystem hierarchy. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
