Re: [DRAFT] Container mini-summit notes v0.01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sorry, I was focusing on the virtual server needs.
>
> devpts is it's own fs so I was fully expecting to make it mountable
> multiple times so a container can have it's own /dev/pts/0.  So what
> other virtual devices would we want to be able to rec-reate for a
> migrated application?  (I wonder (a) what gregkh will say about having
> a device namespace, and (b) what the sysfs implications will be)

Depends.  There are things like the loop device that could be interesting.
There may be some others.  I haven't looked at it enough detail to get
beyond the fact that in some sense it isn't just limited to pts devices.

A multimount devpts is interesting though.

Eric

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux