On 09/03, sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > By trying to keep is_current_in_ancestor*() general, I guess it is more > complicated than it needs to be right now. > > Would holding the rcu_read_lock() be enough or since our callers hold > it now, can we just drop that too ? I think rcu_read_lock() is not needed right now, and we can drop it. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
