Re: [PATCH 3/3] Signal semantics for pid namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/31, sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> @@ -48,7 +49,7 @@ static int sig_init_ignore(struct task_s
>  	if (likely(!is_container_init(tsk->group_leader)))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (!in_interrupt())
> +	if (is_current_in_ancestor_pid_ns(tsk) && !in_interrupt())
>  		return 0;

We should return 1 in that case, afaics the logic is wrongly reversed.

Oleg.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux