On 08/21, sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I am still reviewing this patch and will try to plug in the multiple > pid ns code and play with it some more in the next couple of days. Thanks! > But am curious why we need the in_interrupt() check and that too only > for the container-init process. For example, send_sigio(). We shouldn't send this signal to /sbin/init. But what if the interrupted process is from the parent namespace? > Also, maybe a dumb que, are the checks for SIG_IGN and SIG_DFL required > both on sender side and the receiver side (get_signal_to_deliver()) get_signal_to_deliver() checks SIG_IGN/SIG_DFL, but I guess you meant a special check for init. Unless the patch is wrong, this is not needed. And, in fact we can't do this anyway. Because get_signal_to_deliver() can't know if the signal comes from parent namespace or not. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers