Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxx): > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxx): >>> Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>>> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxx): >>>>> Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>>>>> I just sent the next (final) version of the containers development >>>>>> roadmap. Eric Biederman and Paul Menage will be at kernel summit >>>>>> representing this work. >>>>>> >>>>>> We had planned on having a containers mini-summit the day before the >>>>>> kernel summit. However interest in that appears as though it may be >>>>>> too low to justify having a real mini-summit. >>>>>> >>>>>> So we have a few options: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. we could have a mini-summit purely by phone. >>>>>> 2. there is a possibility of using a part of a >>>>>> conference room from LCE, if attendance will >>>>>> be low. However, having a phone line to include >>>>>> those who cannot attend would be unlikely. >>>>>> 3. if there is a large planned attendance, we could >>>>>> continue to seek a separate venue for the >>>>>> mini-summit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who is interested in (a) attending the mini-summit in person, (b) >>>>>> attending the mini-summit by phone, or (c) not interested? >>>>> I will be there in person. >>>> Still waiting to hear whether anyone other than yourself, Eric, and Paul >>>> would be there... If not, I assume you could meet in one of your hotel >>>> rooms and dial into the phone meeting? :) >>> Well, actually, I'd prefer meeting in person even if there will be >> That's what I meant - if there are <6 people, meet in person in >> someone's hotel room, and then you've got a phone right there so >> everyone else can dial in. >>> only 4 people. Talking tete-a-tete is always better than phone-a-phone :) >>> >>> Except for to meet in some cafe/park in case not many people come. >>> >>>>>> For those interested in attending, what would you expect to happen at >>>>>> the mini-summit? a) discuss the roadmap to ensure everyone is >>>>>> properly represented at the summit b) go over pieces of functionality >>>>> >from the roadmap and discuss implementation options, who is >>>>>> interested in working on what, and possible timelines. c) something >>>>>> else. >>>>> I think it would be good if someone makes a short presentation of >>>>> what is already done and what is being developed now so that we all >>>>> can have an overall picture in sight. >>>> Hmm, so in front of the current 'roadmap' you'd like to see a list of >>>> what's been accomplished so far? >>> Not exactly. The entire picture. E.g. I have no idea of what is going on >>> with network namespaces and checkpoint/restart. I'd also like to know >>> what >>> people think about the kernel memory resource management that was >>> discussed >>> long ago and some more questions. >> We could certainly come up with a set of 'status updates' if people >> would like that. I.e. >> pidns updates - Pavel/suka >> netns updates - Eric/Daniel/Benjamin >> task containers - Paul >> memory container - Balbir >> memory checkpoint - Dave > > Thanks. I will prepare some presentation. BTW, maybe we can organize Great, thanks. > some kind of containers BoF on the conference itself to make other > people come and listen. Maybe this will attract more developers to the > virtualization? In this case the presentation may be more descriptive. By 'the conference itself' do you mean LCE? That might be worth a shot. thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers