Re: [PATCH 14/15] Destroy pid namespace on init's death

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/01, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
>>>	If the main thread is exiting, but is not the last thread in the
>>>	group, should we let it exit and let the next thread in the group
>>>	the reaper of the pid ns ?
>>
>>Well, what happens with a multithreaded init today?
> 
> 
> As it was already discussed, the current code is buggy, and should be
> fixed.

I'm not that sure it MUST be fixed. There are no multi-threaded init's anywhere.
Oleg, does it worth changing without reasons?

Thanks,
Kirill
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux