Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 07/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Look, proc_flush_task() doesn't need pid, it can use active pid_ns
Oops. Yes, proc_flush_task() doesn't use ->numbers[].nr, but it should?
proc_flush_task_mnt() uses task->pid to flush /proc/$pid, this looks wrong,
we should use ->number[ns->level].nr, no?
Indeed. Hmm, why then pids were released during my tests...
Looks like we do still need struct pid for proc_flush_task().
Oleg.
Thanks,
Pavel
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers