On 07/26, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > TODO: This is more an exploratory patch and modifies only interfaces > necessary to implement correct signal semantics in pid namespaces. > > If the approach is feasible, we could consistently use 'kern_siginfo' > in other signal interfaces and possibly in 'struct sigqueue'. > > We could modify dequeue_signal() to directly work with 'kern_siginfo' > and remove dequeue_signal_kern_info(). Well... I know, it is very easy to blame somebody else's patch, and probably my taste is not good... But honestly, I personally think this approach is a horror, and any alternative is better :) I'd rather change dequeue_signal() so that it takes "struct sigqueue *" parameter instead of "siginfo_t *", or add a new "int *flags". OK, this doesn't work anyway, we should do something different. Perhaps just do all checks on sender's side. It is a bit strange that this patch is 3/15, and the rest bits in 11/15, not very convenient for the review. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
