sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Pavel Emelianov [xemul@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| diff -upr linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1.orig/fs/proc/array.c
| linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-7/fs/proc/array.c
| --- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1.orig/fs/proc/array.c 2007-07-26
| 16:34:45.000000000 +0400
| +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-7/fs/proc/array.c 2007-07-26
| 16:36:36.000000000 +0400
| @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
| #include <linux/cpuset.h>
| #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
| #include <linux/delayacct.h>
| +#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
|
| #include <asm/pgtable.h>
| #include <asm/processor.h>
| @@ -161,7 +162,9 @@ static inline char *task_state(struct ta
| struct group_info *group_info;
| int g;
| struct fdtable *fdt = NULL;
| + struct pid_namespace *ns;
|
| + ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns;
| rcu_read_lock();
| buffer += sprintf(buffer,
| "State:\t%s\n"
| @@ -172,9 +175,12 @@ static inline char *task_state(struct ta
| "Uid:\t%d\t%d\t%d\t%d\n"
| "Gid:\t%d\t%d\t%d\t%d\n",
| get_task_state(p),
| - p->tgid, p->pid,
| - pid_alive(p) ? rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->tgid : 0,
| - pid_alive(p) && p->ptrace ? rcu_dereference(p->parent)->pid
| : 0,
| + task_tgid_nr_ns(p, ns),
| + task_pid_nr_ns(p, ns),
| + pid_alive(p) ?
| + task_ppid_nr_ns(p, ns) : 0,
| + pid_alive(p) && p->ptrace ?
| + task_tgid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(p->parent), ns) : 0,
Hmm. I think we have this reversed here. We should print the 'tgid' of
task->real_parent and 'pid' of task->parent.
You mean smth like task_tgid_nr_ns(p->real_parent) ? Yes, thanks :)
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
