Eric W. Biederman wrote: > My next project is most likely going to be to dig in and make the > loopback device a normal network device (not statically allocated) > as a cleanup in preparation for the network namespace work. I can do this :) As far as I understand the code, loopback device is used in two fashions: - as a real network device - and as a "stable" never freed piece of memory I presume, they should be separated. As for device itself, there is a some sort of a template in a Pavel's virtual ethernet device driver... > Feel free to pick the patches apart. Especially in the core of the > network stack. I think that a small plan of submitting process is a good idea, at least we will be able to coordinate the efforts and work in parallel. > I'm hoping to start seriously submitting patches short after the merge > window closes. So we can get a long test/review cycle. :) Regards, Den _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
