Paul (??) Menage wrote: > On 7/17/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> That sounds correct. I wonder now if the solution should be some form >> of delegation for deletion of unreferenced containers (HINT: work queue >> or kernel threads). > > What a great idea. In fact, that's exactly what the release agent > patch already does. :-) I should have seen that. I am a little lost thinking that container_rmdir() and the release agent check_for_release() work without too much knowledge of each other. BTW, what are the semantics of css_put() is it expected to free the container/run the release agent when the reference count of the container_subsys_state drops to zero? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
