Re: [Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] containers development plans (July 10 version)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:59 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > 2. Keep separate lists of swap devices for each container
> >    - each container is allowed to use a subset of the system's
> >      swap files
> 
> sounds okay too ...
> 
> >    eventually:
> >    - keep a per-container list of which pte values correspond
> >      to which swapfiles
> >    - pte swap values are only valid inside of one container
> 
> smells like additional memory and cpu overhead

At the point when you care what these are, you're either writing to swap
or reading from it.  I don't think it's a very cpu-sensitive path.

In any case, we don't have to do this now.  We'll just be limited to the
existing number of global swapfiles.

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux