Srivatsa wrote:
> So Ingo was proposing we use cpuset as that user interface to manage
> task-groups. This will be only for 2.6.23.
Good explanation - thanks.
In short, the proposal was to use the task partition defined by cpusets
to define CFS task-groups, until the real process containers are
available.
Or, I see in the next message, Ingo responding favorably to your
alternative, using task uid's to partition the tasks into CFS
task-groups.
Yeah, Ingo's preference for using uid's (or gid's ??) sounds right to
me - a sustainable API.
Wouldn't want to be adding a cpuset API for a single 2.6.N release.
... gid's -- why not?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
