YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> Add the meta_page to the per container LRU. The reclaim algorithm has been >> modified to make the isolate_lru_pages() as a pluggable component. The >> scan_control data structure now accepts the container on behalf of which >> reclaims are carried out. try_to_free_pages() has been extended to become >> container aware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > it seems that the number of pages to scan (nr_active/nr_inactive > in shrink_zone) is calculated from NR_ACTIVE and NR_INACTIVE of the zone, > even in the case of per-container reclaim. is it intended? > > YAMAMOTO Takashi Good catch again! We do that for now since the per zone LRU is a superset of the container LRU. I see this as an important TODO item for us -- to move to reclaim statistics based on per container nr_active and nr_inactive (to be added). -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
