Quoting Paul Jackson (pj@xxxxxxx): > Serge wrote: > > So if any development is planned over the next year on top of > > Pauls Menage's containers and/or cpusets, we'd like that listed > > here as well. > > Well, apparenntly you guys are planning some "container" stuff > that is on top of or relates to in some way unclear to me with > Menage's containers and/or cpusets. > > I'll repeat my question a third time ... not knowing any clearer > way to state it than before, I'll just quote myself: Please see the next response I sent, and let me know what I've still failed to clarify there. (trying to avoid more repeating :) thanks, -serge > > So ... will you (those using the netns patches) be using Paul Menage's > > containers, or competing with them for the same ends, or what? > > > > To repeat my original question, what is the relation between the work > > described on this thread (which some OLS discussions have decided to > > base on the netns patches) and Paul Menage's containers and my (now the > > community's) cpusets. > > -- > I won't rest till it's the best ... > Programmer, Linux Scalability > Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401 _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
