Hi, Pavel, Pavel Emelianov wrote: > Balbir Singh wrote: > > As far as I remember at OLS we decided to implement per-zone RLU > lists and reuse the lru lock as well. This will remove all the > problems with per-container lists inconsistency. > It's there in the TODO list. It is easy to implement. I can do that in the next revision. We are re-using the LRU lock, since the isolate_pages callback is called under the zone's LRU lock. > Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must. > I remember that we discussed having one limit, but we can come up with a configuration parameter to do it. I'll do that in the next release. > BTW, if you send smb. else's patches you may include a 'From: xxx' > line into the letter to address the original author. > I'll do that for the res_counters_infra patch. Although I had used res_counter, the hooks in mm_struct earlier (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/19/12). A lot of the code for the reclaim logic and the meta_page is yours. Please do identify patches where you would like to see your signed-off-by and where you think the entire patch is completely yours. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
