Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Container Freezer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Cedric Le Goater (clg@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 17:07 +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> >> This patchset is a prototype using the container infrastructure and
> >> the swsusp freezer to freeze a group of tasks. 
> > 
> > And this is useful because you don't want processes doing anything while
> > you try to checkpoint them, right? ;)
> 
> right there's always a reason for a patchset :) The freezer is something 
> already used by openvz. IBM's Metacluster uses a from kernel SIGSTOP signal. 
> 
> I would be in favor of adding a new c/r signal like other operating systems 
> have done today and in the past. This is something to discuss.

What do you mean by "would be in favor of" - you'd prefer that to this
subsystem?

I definately prefer using the freezer subsystem.

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux