Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:02:19PM +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote: >>> on Linux-VServer,we have accounting for those >>> proxies (and several other namespace related stuff) >>> because we already suspected leakage and reference >>> bugs in this area some time ago ... btw, I also >>> suggested to put a similar functionality in mainline >>> for the time being, but it was ignored, as usual ... >> something like a kmem_cache ? > > maybe, but even simplest accounting of the > different 'objects' would be more then enough > for the test phase (or maybe as statistics :) Sure but Linux-VServer would certainly beneficiate from a nsproxy cache. Some scenarii do a lot of unshare(), nop ? Anyway, i wouldn't know how to measure the difference :) but it certainly helped me to identify the leak real fast ! >> and we are not ignoring vserver ! :) > > good for them, our project is called Linux-VServer :) arg :) Cheers, C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers