Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'd still like to hear back from Kirill & co whether this framework is > flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too. My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look ready/suitable. We need to have a working SMP version before it will be clear whether the whole approach is good and works correct on variety of load patterns. Thanks, Kirill _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
