On 6/9/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Would it not be simplest to have CONTAINERS as the top-level user-configurable item and to then have everything else depend on it?
Yes, OK - it can go that way around too. I guess my thought was that people would be more interested in enabling/disabling the subsystems themselves (cpusets, RSS, etc) than the underlying framework. But if select has problems then it's no trouble to invert it. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
