On 6/8/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anyway the patch I sent is simple enough, and if users end up demanding the ability to better deal with exclusive cpusets, the patch will be simple enough to extend by changing cpuset_auto_setup(), so let's stick with that patch since it's your preference (IIUC).
Sounds good to me, although I think my preference would be to extend the "create()" subsystem callback with a "struct task_struct *clone_task" parameter that indicates that clone_task is cloning its own container; a subsystem like cpusets that needs to do additional setup at that point could inherit settings either from the parent or from clone_task's container (or something else) as desired. (It could also do permission checking based on properties of clone_task, etc). Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
