Re: [PATCH 00/10] Containers(V10): Generic Process Containers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What you describe, Serge, sounds like semantics carried over from cpusets.

Serge wrote:
> A task can't join a cpuset unless 'cpus' and 'mems' are set.

Yup - don't want to run a task in a cpuset that lacks cpu, or lacks
memory.  Hard to run without those.

> These don't seem to automatically inherit the parent's values

Yup - early in the life of cpusets, a created cpuset inherited the cpus
and mems of its parent.  But that broke the exclusive property big
time.  You will recall that a cpu_exclusive or mem_exclusive cpuset
cannot overlap the cpus or memory, respectively, of any of its sibling
cpusets.

So we changed it to creating new cpusets empty of cpus or memory.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux