Kirill Korotaev wrote: >> the results were also very reproducible but the profiling was too noisy. >> we also changed the kernel. the previous pidns patchset was on a 2.6.21-mm2 >> and we ported it on a 2.6.22-rc1-mm1. > > If reproducible, then were they the same as Pavel posted? > >> but let me remove some debugging options, > > sure. for info, I just noticed that one of the host running the bench was using acpi as a clocksource and not tsc bc it was considered fuzzy. All my apologies. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
