Re: [Devel] Re: nptl perf bench and profiling with pidns patchsets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Kirill Korotaev (dev@xxxxx):
>>> Cedric,
>>>
>>> just a small note.
>>> imho it is not correct to check performance with enabled debug in memory allocator
>>> since it can influence cache efficiency much.
>>> In you case looks like you have DEBUG_SLAB enabled.
>> Hm, good point.  Cedric, did you ever run any tests with profiling and
>> debugging turned off?
> 
> I'd like to add that the results-for-comparison have to be run
> with profiler turned off. Further, if we need to know what the
> bottleneck is, the profiler is on, but the numbers get are not
> trusted.
> 
> Cedric, may I ask you to rerun the tests with both the debug and
> the profiler turned off and report the results again?

sure. let me do all debug=off first because i'm interested in some
figures.

so what do you think of the nptl perf benchmark to evaluate our 
progress ? 

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux