On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 15:13 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > First note on that, (current == child_reaper(current)) is correct if we > want to treat a container init as init no matter who sends the signal, > however I contend that if a signal is sent from an ancester namespace, > then we want to treat the task like any other task. > > Could I get some confirmation or rebuttal from Suka, Eric, Dave, or > Pavel? I agree with this. Signals should only be special when you're sending them "up the chain" to _your_ init process. We shouldn't do anything at all special to them when one process in a set of peers just happens to be the init for a child namespace. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
