"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> 3. Cleaner logic for namespace migration: with this approach >> one need to save the virtual pid and let global one change; >> with Suka's logic this is not clear how to migrate the level >> 2 namespace (concerning init to be level 0). > > This is a very good point. > > How *would* we migrate the pids at the second level? As long as you don't try and restore pids into the initial pid namespace it isn't a problem. You just record the pid hierarchy and the pid for a task in that hierarchy. There really is nothing special going on that should make migration hard. Or did I miss something? Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
