Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/9] Containers (V9): Generic Process Containers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:23:52PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Umm, no - please naje two versions with and without the lock.

Ok this patch may not be necessary (given Paul's observation that
read_lock will suffice in update_nodemask).

> Also Please fix up the codingstyle, the { belongs onto a line of it's own.

Paul, I suspect that there are a number of Codingstyle related changes you
may need to address in your next version (including the one pointed by 
Christoph) 


-- 
Regards,
vatsa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux