Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx> writes: > I think this was originally coded with daemonize to avoid issues with > reaping children. Dean Nelson can correct me if I am wrong. I assume > this patch is going in as part of the set which will make these threads > clear themselves from the children list and if that is the case, I can > see no issues. One of my earlier patches guarantees that kthreadd will have pid == 2. daemonize actually explicitly reparents to init so using daemonize and kernel_thread provides no help at all with respect to scaling. It in fact guarantees you will be on init's list of child processes. The work to enhance wait is a little tricky and it conflicts with the utrace patches, which makes it hard to pursue at the moment. I'm actually sorting out kthread stop so I can complete the pid namespace. But since all kthreads are children of kthreadd this helps in a small way with the scaling issue. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
