On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:25:40 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Use FS_SAFE for "fuse" fs type, but not for "fuseblk". > > FUSE was designed from the beginning to be safe for unprivileged > users. This has also been verified in practice over many years. How does FUSE do this? There are obvious cases like crafting a filesystem which has setuid executables or world-writeable device nodes or whatever. I'm sure there are lots of other cases. Where is FUSE's implementation of all this protection described? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
