> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx> > > > > If MNT_USERMNT flag is not set in the target vfsmount, then > > MNT_USER and MNT_USERMNT? I claim no way will people keep those > straight. How about MNT_ALLOWUSER and MNT_USER? Umm, is "allowuser" more clear than "usermnt"? What is allowed to the user? "allowusermnt" may be more descriptive, but it's a bit too long. I don't think it matters all that much, the user will have to look up the semantics in the manpage anyway. Is "nosuid" descriptive? Not very much, but we got used to it. Miklos _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
