On 4/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is the first argument into all the callbacks, struct container_subsys *ss, > necessary? I added it to support library-like abstractions - where one subsystem can have its container callbacks and file accesses all handled by a library which converts to a higher-level abstraction. See the res_group example patch to see how it can be used. > > > +struct container_subsys cpuset_subsys = { > > + .name = "cpuset", > > + .create = cpuset_create, > > + .destroy = cpuset_destroy, > > + .can_attach = cpuset_can_attach, > > + .attach = cpuset_attach, > > + .populate = cpuset_populate, > > + .subsys_id = cpuset_subsys_id, > > + .early_init = 1, > > +}; > > We seem to be missing a register call here as well .. Registration is done at compile time in the new patch set, thanks to the static declaration of subsystems and subsystem ids. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers