Patrick McHardy wrote: > Maybe not wireless, but bonding, briding, vlan, etun, possibly more. [if I understand you correctly] I agree. With ethtool, the idea is to have a single tool that supports multiple hardware platforms -- even to the point of introducing hardware-specific code into ethtool. While I agree with wireless-dev that wireless /needs/ a separate tool, for things like bridging and vlan it would certainly be nice to mitigate the tool count explosion. Jeff _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
