On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 07:13:37AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > > ns should have a refcount of 1 to begin with. > > Right - that's my point, you're effectively passing the initial > refcount of the nsproxy to the container directory's d_fsdata > reference. sure .. > > Basically I am struggling to answer "How can a zero refcount (beancounter) > > object go non-zero when zero tasks are attached to it" .. > > In that case, I think you're fine. Your last posted patches didn't > provide a way to check for that, though, as far as I could see. Yes, the last patch I posted is very primitive considering all the discussions we had ..For ex: attach_task() in the last patch has more bugs [apart from the exit race I found recently with cpusets/containers] Each time I stopped and stared at attach_task() I could find a bug .. -- Regards, vatsa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
