On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:43:48PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > I'm unsure here, but this 'tsk->cpuset == cs' test feels fragile to me. > > How about a bit earlier in attach_task(), right at the point we overwrite the > victim tasks cpuset pointer, we decrement the count on the old cpuset, and if > it went to zero, remember that we'll need to release it, once we've dropped > some locks: Looks neater. Will adopt this when I send the patch. Thanks. -- Regards, vatsa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
