Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|
| > Yes! I meant we should change INIT_SIGNALS(), currently it does
| >
| > #define INIT_SIGNALS(sig) {
| > ...
| > .pgrp = 1,
| > { .__session = 1},
| >
| > and this confuses (I think) set_special_pids(1,1) above. Because
| > __set_special_pids() still deals with pid_t, not "struct pid".
| >
| > Unless I missed something, we should kill these 2 initializations
| > above.
|
| Got it. I agree we should initialize those fields to 0.
|
| Sukadev you want to get that?
Sure. Will do that.
Thanks Oleg for your detailed review/comments.
Suka
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
