Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/13/07, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> note: network isolation is not supposed to add overhead
> compared to the host system (at least not measureable
> overhead)

Does "network isolation" involve giving each network namespace a
separate IP address, etc? If so, that's something that some people
might not want (and specifically, that we don't want). If not, what
does it add over existing Linux traffic control (via tc)?

Thanks,

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux