On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:24:59PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > what about identifying different resource categories and > handling them according to the typical usage pattern? > > like the following: > > - cpu and scheduler related accounting/limits > - memory related accounting/limits > - network related accounting/limits > - generic/file system related accounting/limits > > I don't worry too much about having the generic/file stuff > attached to the nsproxy, but the cpu/sched stuff might be > better off being directly reachable from the task I think we should experiment with both combinations (a direct pointer to cpu_limit structure from task_struct and an indirect pointer), get some numbers and then decide. Or do you have results already with respect to that? > > 3. How are cpusets related to vserver/containers? > > > > Should it be possible to, lets say, create exclusive cpusets and > > attach containers to different cpusets? > > that is what Linux-VServer does atm, i.e. you can put > an entire guest into a specific cpu set Interesting. What abt /dev/cpuset view? Is that same for all containers or do you restrict that view to the containers cpuset only? -- Regards, vatsa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
