sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] Define helper functions to unshare pid namespace > > Define clone_pid_ns() and unshare_pid_ns() functions that will be > used in the next patch to unshare pid namespace. > > Changelog: > - Rewrite of orignal code in -lxc from Cedric Le Goater to enforce > setsid() requirement on unshare(). Why do we need a setsid() before we unshare? I know it is almost always the correct thing to do but what requires the setsid? Doing the setsid before we switch pid namespaces appears the wrong order to me. I am not convinced that unshare can be done safely for a pid namespace. Changing the meaning or definition of pid on a running process is questionable. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
