Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:59:24PM -0800, sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [RFC][PATCH 4/6] Initialize struct pid_nr for swapper. >> >> Statically initialize a struct pid_nr for the swapper process. > > does that actually satisfy procfs needs too, or > just the abstract internal references? > > because if it is enough to make procfs happy, this > would be a viable solution for the lightweight guest > case (as fake init process) too, which doesn't require > a blend through functionality anymore, and would allow > to make the pid isolation complete without wasting > any resources ... Herbert I'm not quite certain what you are asking but largely I think the answer is yes. Making procfs work on top of something like this patchset is pretty straight forward. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
