On 3/7/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quoting Srivatsa Vaddagiri (vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx): > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:32:07PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > > > I'm not really sure that I see the value of having this be part of > > > nsproxy rather than the previous independent container (and > > > container_group) structure. > > > > *shrug* > > > > I wrote the patch mainly to see whether the stuff container folks (Sam Vilain > > et al) were complaining abt (that container structure abstraction > > inside the kernel is redundant/unnecessary) made sense or not. > > I still think the complaint was about terminology, not implementation. No, Sam was saying that nsproxy should be the object that all resource controllers hook off. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
