Re: [PATCH 0/7] containers (V7): Generic Process Containers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Sam Vilain (sam@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Paul Menage wrote:

> We talked about naming a bit before, see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/21/403 and possibly other threads.  So,
> anyway, feel free to flog this old dead horse and suggest different
> terms.  We've all had long enough to think about it since so maybe it's

Bah,

Paul, how about s/container/rug/, as in resource usage group?

At least you can be pretty sure that (a) rug won't conflict with any
other computer science therm, and (b) for that exact reason it should be
pretty memorable.

-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux