On 2/13/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul at sw.ru> wrote: > > I have implementation that moves arbitrary task :) Is that the one that calls stop_machine() in order to move a task around? That seemed a little heavyweight ... > May be we can do context (container-on-task) handling lockless? What did you have in mind? > > I thought that we solved that problem by having a tmp_bc field in the > > task_struct that would take precedence over the main bc if it was > > non-null? > > Of course, but I'm commenting this patchset which doesn't have > this facility. OK, I can add the concept in to the example too. Paul
