Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Ok, could you verify that the following patch at least solves > the oopsing? > > (I can't reproduce the oops with Daniel's test prog) > > thanks, > -serge Indeed, this patch solves the oopsing, but so did the last one. I think I finally managed to figure out why too, as release_task would be called with current referring to the parent process, or whoever is reaping the process with the last reference to the namespace. Right? Regardless, I have to say I prefer this patch. -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson
