Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Should we make this change or just continue using process_group() (and > eventually modify it to return pid_nr(task_pgrp(tsk)). that's what I would do. C.
Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > Should we make this change or just continue using process_group() (and > eventually modify it to return pid_nr(task_pgrp(tsk)). that's what I would do. C.
![]() |