Cedric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com> writes: > > your first analysis was correct : exit_task_namespaces() should be moved > above exit_notify(tsk). It will require some extra fixes for nsproxy > though. I think the only issue is the child_reaper and currently we only have one of those. When we really do the pid namespace we are going to have to revisit this. My gut feel says that we won't be able to exit our pid namespace until the process is waited on. So we may need to break up exit_task_namespace into individual components. Eric
