"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes: > > Or we could go ahead and fully implement it in procfs. As you'd said > earlier, that really maps best into what we want. Containerfs was > just much simpler and quicker to implement for demonstrating the semantics. That sounds like the safe bet. I'm keeping the other idea around in case we find something that needs a little more power :) Eric
