clg at fr.ibm.com writes: > From: Cedric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com> > > This patch adds a hashtable of nsproxy using the nsproxy as a key. > init_nsproxy is hashed at init with key 0. This is considered to be > the 'host' nsproxy. NAK. Which namespace do these ids live in? It sounds like you are setting up to make the 'host' nsproxy special and have special rules. That also sounds wrong. Even letting the concept of nsproxy escape to user space sounds wrong. nsproxy is an internal space optimization. It's not struct container and I don't think we want it to become that. Eric
