Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert at 13thfloor.at): > > just a question: why do we keep the fs (struct_fs) > outside of nsproxy? Good question. So we have a mounts namespace, and you would consider the per-process fs root to be an fs namespace? Practically, it would mean that chroot and pivot_mount would create a new nsproxy, but i guess that's not a real problem. It might force us to stop our current lazy checks for 'current->nsproxy==&init_nsproxy', since the pivot_mount in early boot would make that not true. -serge
