Herbert Poetzl wrote: [ ... ] > that's just a waste of resources ... IMHO it is > a little weird to actually consider having an init > process 'just' to have a reference for a bunch of > namespaces, given that you might want to access > them individually, am I missing something? > > for me this suggestion sounds like making a dog > mandatory for each household, so that when you > want to get the younger son on the phone you > can refer to him as 'the younger son of the family > with the dog charly' :) ... there is still the child reaping issue. we need sometask to collect the SIGCHLD of a pidspace because we can't redirect them the real init. This would create pid collisions and the real init might well respawn a process that has never died. C.
